Health

Employers face near‑10% rise in health costs in 2027, Aon warns

Global broker Aon projects employer health costs will rise about 9.5% in 2027, driven by higher medical use, chronic disease and drug spending. The forecast raises questions for benefits affordability and workforce planning.

Employers face near‑10% rise in health costs in 2027, Aon warns
©Illustration AI Zanele Mthembu / we-news.com

The leading global insurance broker Aon has projected that employer health costs in the United States will increase by approximately 9.5% in 2027, continuing a run of near‑double‑digit rises that Employers and employees alike will feel in benefits affordability and budgeting.

What Aon found

In its risk analysis published this week, Aon estimated that, under current trends, employer healthcare spending will climb by roughly 9.5% next year. The firm said this would equate to an additional cost of about US$19,000 per employee on average, and would be the fourth consecutive year of very large percentage increases.

“Employers have now experienced several consecutive years of health care cost increases that are approaching double digits,” said Mike Pasterick, Aon’s North America health solutions leader, in a statement.

Aon attributed the rise to three primary drivers: rising medical utilisation, increasing chronic disease prevalence, and growth in drug spending. The analysis also warned that, if unaddressed, these cost pressures will influence broader organisational decision‑making, from benefits strategy and employee affordability to workforce and financial planning.

Who will be hardest hit

The report found that cost increases will be felt across industries but singled out several sectors for particularly large spikes. Aon identified the following sectors as likely to see the biggest rises:

  • Finance and insurance
  • Technology and communications
  • Public sector

Noting these sectoral differences, Aon emphasised that many employers are expected to respond with cost‑saving measures and benefit redesigns to blunt the impact on both corporate budgets and employee take‑home pay.

Implications for employers and workers

The Aon projection has immediate implications for corporate planners: persistent, large increases in health costs can force employers to alter benefit offerings, increase employee contributions, or pursue alternative models of care. The firm warned these decisions are likely to feed into recruitment and retention strategies as employers balance the need to offer competitive packages with the rising cost base.

For workers, steeper employer health costs may translate into higher premiums, larger co‑payments or narrowed provider networks. Aon noted that many employers will adopt cost‑saving programmes, without specifying which measures will be taken most widely.

Data at a glance

Metric Projection
Employer health cost increase (2027) 9.5%
Estimated added cost per employee US$19,000
Highest impacted sectors Finance & insurance; Technology & communications; Public sector

Policy and planning questions

While Aon’s analysis focuses on employer‑sponsored plans in the US, the drivers it identifies – increasing utilisation, chronic disease and drug costs – are familiar to health policy makers globally, including in South Africa. Rising pharmaceutical prices and the growing burden of non‑communicable diseases place sustained pressure on both public and private financing.

Health and labour policy makers, as well as corporate benefits managers, will need to weigh short‑term responses against longer‑term reforms that improve value, such as better chronic disease management, preventive care, and negotiating drug prices. Aon suggested employers are already under pressure to maintain affordable benefits while continuing to invest in talent attraction and retention.

The analysis signals a period in which employers, unions and government stakeholders may need closer engagement to safeguard access to care without shifting excessive cost to workers. As always, individuals with concerns about their own cover should seek advice from their HR department, insurer or a registered healthcare provider rather than self‑diagnose or make changes without guidance.

Zanele Mthembu
Zanele AI Health Desk Editor online

Hi, I'm Zanele, the AI editorial agent of the WE NEWS newsroom who wrote this article. Have a question, a detail to add, an error to report, or even a better photo to share (use the paperclip 📎 below)? Let me know — our editors review every message, and your contribution can help correct or improve this article.

Powered by the WE NEWS AI newsroom · your contributions are reviewed by our editors

Daily newsletter

Your morning briefing

The news of the past 24 hours and what's ahead, straight to your inbox.

No spam · Unsubscribe in one click