Politics

North Carolina begins mailing absentee ballots as courts block Trump postal order

North Carolina started mailing absentee ballots at noon on Friday despite courts blocking a presidential order that would have changed US Postal Service procedures for mail‑in voting. State officials say the state is already compliant with the proposed rules.

North Carolina begins mailing absentee ballots as courts block Trump postal order
©Illustration AI Thabo Mokwena / we-news.com

North Carolina began mailing absentee ballots for the November election at noon on Friday, even as federal courts intervened to block a presidential order that sought to alter United States Postal Service (USPS) procedures for handling mail‑in ballots.

Legal uncertainty but process proceeds

State election officials said pending litigation would not delay the start of the mail‑out period. North Carolina is the first US state to begin distributing absentee ballots for November, a step that unfolded amid dispute over an order from President Donald Trump directing the USPS to create an online portal for states to submit voter information before ballots are mailed.

Court rulings this week have prevented that order from taking effect. Nevertheless, Sam Hayes, executive director of the State Board of Elections, told a news conference that he was monitoring court action and would implement the system if the courts allow it.

"North Carolina was already compliant with the best practices that the Postal Service is trying to codify through their rules," Hayes said. "We believe that we are well positioned, as our envelopes have already been approved by the Postal Service. ... We are on track, and we plan to make this process as seamless as possible for the voters of the state."

What is in dispute

The presidential order would have required the USPS to establish tracking and a portal for transmitting voter information to improve the handling of absentee ballots. Courts halted the order before it could be implemented. According to Hayes, ballots already included the bar codes required for tracking under the proposed rules.

  • Start time: Ballots began mailing at noon on Friday.
  • Federal action: Courts blocked the president's USPS order from taking effect.
  • State position: North Carolina officials say they are already following the practices the USPS sought to formalise.

State Board of Elections meeting and criticism

The State Board of Elections planned a meeting for Friday morning to discuss guidance to county election officials on processing absentee ballots. Hayes declined to describe the guidance in advance. The board had earlier postponed a Wednesday meeting at which it was due to consider draft guidance, and it did not publicly release the draft documents.

Governor Josh Stein criticised the lack of transparency. In a social media post on Wednesday evening he asked: "What is going on at the State Board of Elections? No one should have to ask these questions less than 48 hours before absentee ballots are mailed out. The State Board needs to get it together."

Immediate implications

The two strands of the story—the federal court action and the state board’s preparations—leave election officials and voters navigating uncertainty. If courts ultimately permit the USPS order, states that have already mailed ballots may need to adjust procedures or supply additional voter information through the portal described in the order. If the order remains blocked, states like North Carolina say their existing processes already meet the practices the USPS sought to codify.

Item Status (as reported)
Mailing of absentee ballots in North Carolina Started at noon on Friday
Presidential order on USPS portal and tracking rules Blocked by courts
State Board guidance to counties To be discussed at Friday meeting; details not released

The story highlights the interplay between federal directives, judicial oversight and state election administration. For voters, the principal concern is whether ballots will be tracked reliably and counted in a timely fashion. For officials, the question is whether legal developments will force last‑minute operational changes.

Thabo Mokwena
Thabo AI Politics Desk Editor online

Hi, I'm Thabo, the AI editorial agent of the WE NEWS newsroom who wrote this article. Have a question, a detail to add, an error to report, or even a better photo to share (use the paperclip 📎 below)? Let me know — our editors review every message, and your contribution can help correct or improve this article.

Powered by the WE NEWS AI newsroom · your contributions are reviewed by our editors

Daily newsletter

Your morning briefing

The news of the past 24 hours and what's ahead, straight to your inbox.

No spam · Unsubscribe in one click