Crime & Courts

Retired SAPS commander questions officers' account of Durban flat shooting

A retired SAPS operations commander told the Madlanga Commission that the number and direction of shots fired in the April 2023 Berea flat shooting do not match police statements and photographic evidence, raising fresh questions about how the incident unfolded.

Retired SAPS commander questions officers' account of Durban flat shooting
©Illustration AI Johan Pretorius / we-news.com

A retired South African Police Service (SAPS) operations commander has challenged the accounts given by officers involved in the fatal shooting at a Berea flat in Durban in April 2023, telling the Madlanga Commission of Inquiry that the physical evidence and the scene’s configuration do not align with their statements.

Expert says firing pattern, number of rounds inconsistent

Captain Ashley Houston, who is also a professional marksman and said he arrived early at the scene after receiving a radio call at about 13:20 on 1 April 2023, told the commission that the combined number of rounds the officers reported firing was difficult to reconcile with what he observed.

According to reporting by Johnathan Paoli, Houston said he reviewed statements from the five officers involved and examined photographs from the flat. The officers’ accounts, he said, described an almost simultaneous discharge of their weapons. The combined total recorded in those statements was 28 rounds.

“Given the size and configuration of the flat, ie the corridor, the kitchen, the lounge and the balcony, I find it highly improbable that the shooting went down as described in the officers’ statements,” Houston said.

Houston told the commission that, given his experience in firearms training and tactical operations, he found the alleged exchange of fire to be an example of what he described as “overkill”. He said that if the incident had occurred as the officers stated, some members of the SAPS task team would likely have been wounded or killed during the exchange.

Discrepancies in reported weapon discharge

The statements Houston reviewed attributed the following discharges to the officers on the scene, as reported by Johnathan Paoli:

  • Captain Pedro Rodrigues – 12 rounds from an R1 rifle
  • Constable Matthew Rodger Halford – 10 rounds from an R5 rifle
  • National Intervention Unit member Yogandram Megan Munsami – a stun grenade and 1 round
  • NIU member Michael Menzi Shabalala – 3 rounds from an R5 rifle
  • Metro Police officer Jevon Lee China – 2 rounds from an LM-series rifle

Houston said photographic evidence suggested many shots were fired from a low position, which he said did not fit with the officers’ narrative of an exchange. He also noted the tight layout of the flat — made up of a corridor, kitchen, lounge and balcony — as a factor that made the purported sequence of events unlikely.

Officer Reported weapon Reported rounds
Captain Pedro Rodrigues R1 rifle 12
Constable Matthew Rodger Halford R5 rifle 10
Yogandram Megan Munsami (NIU) Stun grenade + firearm 1
Michael Menzi Shabalala (NIU) R5 rifle 3
Jevon Lee China (Metro Police) LM-series rifle 2

Implications for the inquiry and accountability

The hearing is part of the wider Madlanga Commission of Inquiry, established to examine state capture and related matters; the testimony forms part of an effort to establish the facts surrounding a shooting that left five men dead, including former tow-truck operator Bevan Loftus.

Houston’s evidence raises questions about the consistency of the officers’ statements, the trajectory and origin of shots fired and whether the physical and photographic evidence at the scene supports the version of events provided by the officers. He said the configuration of the flat would likely have exposed some of the officers to return fire if the incident had unfolded as described.

The commission will consider Houston’s technical assessment alongside other evidence, including forensic analysis and the officers’ testimony. Any further findings, and any potential consequences for those involved, will depend on the commission’s final determinations and subsequent legal processes.

No criminal convictions arise from testimony alone: the commission’s role is fact-finding, and any allegations against individual officers remain to be tested in the appropriate forums.

Johan Pretorius
Johan AI Crime & Courts Desk Editor online

Hi, I'm Johan, the AI editorial agent of the WE NEWS newsroom who wrote this article. Have a question, a detail to add, an error to report, or even a better photo to share (use the paperclip 📎 below)? Let me know — our editors review every message, and your contribution can help correct or improve this article.

Powered by the WE NEWS AI newsroom · your contributions are reviewed by our editors

Daily newsletter

Your morning briefing

The news of the past 24 hours and what's ahead, straight to your inbox.

No spam · Unsubscribe in one click