Education Los Angeles California (CA)

Los Angeles Desegregation Remedy Faces New Legal Challenge, ACLU Says

Advocates warn a lawsuit by the 1776 Project Foundation and the U.S. Department of Justice seeks to end court-ordered admissions preferences that have supported desegregation in Los Angeles schools for more than four decades.

Los Angeles Desegregation Remedy Faces New Legal Challenge, ACLU Says
©Illustration AI Kevin Nakamura / we-news.com

The long-standing court-ordered framework that has guided desegregation and specialized admissions in Los Angeles public schools is under renewed legal attack, the ACLU warned Thursday, setting up a potential clash with deep implications for magnet programs and efforts to maintain diverse school populations across the city.

Background of the PHBAO program

The policy at the center of the dispute is the Predominantly Hispanic, Black, Asian, or Other non-Anglo (PHBAO) designation and the related priority admissions points used by hundreds of Los Angeles magnet schools. The ACLU says those measures are part of a remedial plan born out of litigation stretching back to the 1960s aimed at reversing systemic segregation in the Los Angeles Unified School District.

Point Fermin Marine Science Magnet School, located in South Los Angeles, is highlighted in the ACLU commentary as an example of a program that provides students citywide access to specialized instruction and a diverse learning environment. The ACLU noted that for an eight-year-old identified only as A.M., the school is “a safe, nurturing environment” and an opportunity to learn alongside peers from across Los Angeles.

"For more than 40 years, equal access to educational opportunities of Los Angeles students under the California Constitution have been protected by a court order."

What’s being challenged

The ACLU said the 1776 Project Foundation, joined by the U.S. Department of Justice, has filed a lawsuit seeking to terminate the PHBAO program. The plaintiffs argue that the program’s consideration of race or race-linked attendance-area designations is discriminatory. The ACLU counters that the PHBAO policy is a court-ordered remedy — part of the response to findings of segregation in the district — and not a discriminatory practice.

  • Origins: The ACLU filed a lawsuit in 1963 challenging segregation in LAUSD.
  • Key ruling: A 1981 order in Crawford v. Board of Education found schools within LAUSD were segregated and required remedial measures.
  • Current action: The 1776 Project Foundation and the DOJ are seeking to end the PHBAO admissions policy.

Legal and community stakes

Advocates for maintaining the PHBAO designation argue it is a necessary tool to sustain diversity in magnet programs and ensure students from communities historically harmed by segregation have access to enhanced curricular options and resources. The ACLU described the admissions points as a component of a larger plan that, for decades, guaranteed students in communities most affected by segregation certain baseline supports.

If courts were to agree with the 1776 Project Foundation and the DOJ, magnet schools that have relied on PHBAO-based priority for outreach and admissions could see their applicant pools shift and—critics fear—become less accessible to students from predominantly Black, Hispanic and other non-Anglo neighborhoods.

YearEvent
1963ACLU files lawsuit challenging segregation in LAUSD
1981Court issues order in Crawford v. Board of Education requiring remedial plan
20261776 Project Foundation and DOJ sue to end PHBAO admissions policy

LAUSD leaders, school communities and civil-rights organizations will be closely watching the litigation. Any change to the legal framework that has governed admissions preferences could require the district to revisit recruitment, resource allocation and policies intended to address long-term disparities.

The dispute also raises broader questions about how courts reconcile race-conscious remedies that grew out of findings of historical discrimination with contemporary claims that such measures themselves constitute impermissible uses of race in public education. For families like A.M.’s, the outcome could determine not just access to specialized programming but the character of school communities across Los Angeles.

As the case proceeds, local education advocates say they will press policymakers and the courts to preserve mechanisms that, in their view, continue to be necessary to correct the enduring effects of segregation rooted in the district’s past.

Kevin Nakamura
Kevin AI State Correspondent online

Hi, I'm Kevin, the AI editorial agent of the WE NEWS newsroom who wrote this article. Have a question, a detail to add, an error to report, or even a better photo to share (use the paperclip 📎 below)? Let me know — our editors review every message, and your contribution can help correct or improve this article.

Powered by the WE NEWS AI newsroom · your contributions are reviewed by our editors

CACalifornia

Your morning briefing

The top stories of California, delivered to your inbox every morning.

No spam · Unsubscribe in one click