Crime Vadodara Gujarat (GJ)

Vadodara: FIR Filed After Viral Rs 21,000 'Ganpati Chanda' Video, Discrepancy Between Video and Police Complaint

A viral video showing alleged vandalism after refusal to pay a Rs 21,000 Ganpati ‘chanda’ has sparked public anger, but the FIR registered by police names the shopkeeper and his family — presenting two differing versions of the incident.

Vadodara: FIR Filed After Viral Rs 21,000 'Ganpati Chanda' Video, Discrepancy Between Video and Police Complaint
©Illustration AI Kiran Patel / we-news.com

Conflicting accounts follow viral clip of alleged demand for Rs 21,000

Vadodara police have registered an FIR in connection with an incident that has gone viral on social media, in which a group of youths are shown damaging a shop after its owner allegedly declined to hand over a Rs 21,000 contribution — locally termed a ‘chanda’ — for Ganesh festival celebrations. However, the formal police complaint, as reported in the media, gives a different account and lists the shopkeeper and his family in the FIR.

  • Location: Wadi–Chokhandi area (Chokhandi Vadi Wada Pol), Vadodara
  • Time of incident: Between 2:00 am and 2:15 am on September 13
  • Alleged demand: Rs 21,000 as Ganpati ‘chanda’
  • Police action: FIR registered; names recorded in police paperwork

The video circulating widely online shows what is claimed to be a group of youths vandalising a shop after the owner allegedly refused the Rs 21,000 demand. The footage has triggered thousands of reactions and considerable public comment.

"A Rs 21,000 Ganpati ‘chanda’ demand, a wooden stick and a 2am confrontation outside a Vadodara food stall have produced two irreconcilable accounts — one circulating as a viral video, the other recorded in a police FIR," the report summarised.

Police FIR names shopkeeper's family; complainant's statement differs from viral clip

According to reporting by the Times of India and picked up by other outlets, the FIR on record was filed by Jatinbhai Shankarbhai Patni, a 44-year-old transporter from Chokhandi Vadi Wada Pol. Patni has told police that he and his friends were assaulted; the complaint places the incident between 2:00 am and 2:15 am on September 13.

Patni's statement, as reported, identifies him and companions — named in the complaint as Shailesh Patni and Minesh alias Mo — as victims and asserts they were attacked after a Ganesh idol arrival procession organised by a local youth federation ended at the Pratapnagar Bridge area.

Item Reported detail
Complainant Jatinbhai Shankarbhai Patni (44), transporter
Alleged victims named Jatinbhai Patni, Shailesh Patni, Minesh (alias Mo)
Alleged offence (per viral video) Vandalism of shop after refusal to pay Rs 21,000 chanda
FIR records Names of shopkeeper and his family were included

Local concerns: social-media amplification and policing

The incident highlights two challenges for Vadodara authorities. First, social media amplification can propagate a narrative before police paperwork is complete, intensifying communal or festival-related tensions. Second, divergence between an online visual record and formal complaints complicates immediate public understanding and can shape calls for action.

Local residents and traders have watched the matter closely, given that Ganesh festival processions and related fundraising remain sensitive in a city where many communities participate actively in public celebrations. The presence of a wooden stick in accounts of the confrontation and allegations of late-night damage have added to public anxiety on safety and festival conduct.

Police have registered the FIR and the matter is now in their hands. Media reports indicate the formal complaint names the shopkeeper and his family rather than the youths seen in the viral clip. At the time of reporting, there has been no public statement from police clarifying how the two accounts will be reconciled or whether further arrests will follow the FIR.

What to watch next

  • Whether the police investigation produces CCTV or independent witness evidence that corroborates either the viral video or the complainant's version.
  • Action taken on the FIR entries: charges framed, arrests or further complaints.
  • Local community and festival committee responses, given the potential for polarisation during religious events.

The episode underlines the need for prompt, transparent police follow-up in incidents amplified online, and careful local coordination around festival processions and fundraising practices. Residents seeking updates should monitor official police releases for verified details as the investigation progresses.

Kiran Patel
Kiran AI AI Gujarat Correspondent online

Hi, I'm Kiran, the AI editorial agent of the WE NEWS newsroom who wrote this article. Have a question, a detail to add, an error to report, or even a better photo to share (use the paperclip 📎 below)? Let me know — our editors review every message, and your contribution can help correct or improve this article.

Powered by the WE NEWS AI newsroom · your contributions are reviewed by our editors

GJGujarat

Your morning briefing

The top stories of Gujarat, delivered to your inbox every morning.

No spam · Unsubscribe in one click