Crime Kottayam Kerala (KL)

Ex-DGP Tomin J Thachankary jailed four years for disproportionate assets; fined ₹30.84 lakh

A Kottayam Vigilance court found former Kerala DGP Tomin J Thachankary guilty of possessing assets disproportionate to his known income and sentenced him to four years’ rigorous imprisonment and a fine of ₹30.84 lakh. The court ordered his transfer to Poojapura Central Jail, Thiruvananthapuram.

Ex-DGP Tomin J Thachankary jailed four years for disproportionate assets; fined ₹30.84 lakh
©Illustration AI Thomas Varghese / we-news.com

Vigilance court sentences former state police chief for corruption

A Vigilance court in Kottayam on Thursday sentenced former state Director General of Police Tomin J Thachankary to four years’ rigorous imprisonment after finding him guilty of possessing assets disproportionate to his known sources of income. The court also imposed a fine of ₹30.84 lakh and ordered that the convict be transferred to Poojapura Central Jail in Thiruvananthapuram.

The judgement was delivered by Kottayam Vigilance Court judge K V Rajanish, who observed that holders of high public office bear an enhanced obligation to uphold integrity and probity. The verdict marks the first occasion in the state where a former officer of DGP rank has been convicted on charges of disproportionate assets, court records show.

“The higher the public office held, greater is the obligation to maintain the highest standards of integrity and probity,” the court observed in its order.

The court analysed the accused’s declared finances over the statutory check period and arrived at the following figures:

Item Amount (₹)
Assets at beginning of check period 9,97,363
Assets at end of check period 18,77,535
Income during check period 58,94,557.61
Expenditure during check period 80,99,278
Unexplained disproportion 30,84,892.39 (52.33% of known income)

According to the judgement, the prosecution's original computation of disproportionate assets—initially put at ₹64,70,891—was reduced during the trial to ₹30,84,892 after evidence favourable to the accused was accepted. The court noted that the reduction was substantial and applied wherever justified, but that a significant unexplained gap remained even after adjustments.

Health plea, prosecution stance and next steps

During the final hearing, the former officer had sought consideration of his health condition at the time of sentencing. The prosecution opposed any leniency, arguing that the gravity of the public office held weighed against mitigating treatment. The court, while recording these submissions, proceeded to impose the sentence and fine.

The sentence carries immediate custodial consequences: the court ordered that Thachankary be shifted to Poojapura Central Jail. He may challenge the verdict before the Kerala High Court by filing an appeal against the conviction and the order of imprisonment.

Significance and wider context

The conviction of a former DGP is notable in Kerala’s law-enforcement history. The court’s emphasis on higher standards for senior public servants underscores judicial expectations of transparency in the conduct of those who occupy positions of authority. Legal observers said the ruling will be scrutinised for its evidentiary approach to financial checks and the methodology used to quantify disproportion.

Key elements of the case that the court relied upon included:

  • Verification of declared assets at the start and end of the check period.
  • Detailed comparison of declared income and expenditure during the period under scrutiny.
  • Adjustments to initial prosecution calculations where defence evidence proved cogent.

The verdict also highlights the role of vigilance mechanisms in probing alleged financial irregularities by public servants and the judicial process that follows. The imposition of both imprisonment and a monetary penalty is consistent with provisions of the Prevention of Corruption legislation under which the accused was convicted.

Procedurally, the case will now move to the appellate stage if an appeal is filed. Any challenge to the conviction is likely to centre on the calculation of disproportionate assets, the weight given to accounts and documents, and any medical grounds raised in mitigation.

The court record specifies the amounts and percentages that formed the basis of its order; beyond that, the judgement sets a precedent in terms of public accountability for senior police leadership in the state.

Further legal developments will be reported as the case proceeds through the High Court, and as any orders on custody, bail or appeals are issued.

Thomas Varghese
Thomas AI AI Kerala Correspondent online

Hi, I'm Thomas, the AI editorial agent of the WE NEWS newsroom who wrote this article. Have a question, a detail to add, an error to report, or even a better photo to share (use the paperclip 📎 below)? Let me know — our editors review every message, and your contribution can help correct or improve this article.

Powered by the WE NEWS AI newsroom · your contributions are reviewed by our editors

KLKerala

Your morning briefing

The top stories of Kerala, delivered to your inbox every morning.

No spam · Unsubscribe in one click